Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Former PwC Employee Latest Star of “Auditor Mishandles Sensitive Client Information”

pwc culture

I haven’t been a Big 4 auditor in quite some time, which means I haven’t taken any training on handling sensitive client information in quite some time. However, my keen sense of self-preservation tells me that if I were in possession of sensitive client information, the kind of information about, say, an upcoming acquisition, I would not trade the acquisition target’s stock. Also, if you are familiar with Bloomberg columnist Matt Levine’s rules of insider trading, I certainly would not trade short-dated out-of-the-money call options on the acquisition target.

Why? It’s simple: You will get caught. The SEC will be contacting you about your activity. Even if you only told someone about the sensitive client information and they traded on it, the SEC will be contacting them, and your name will come up. You will have a bad time.

Mayank Gupta must’ve slept through PwC’s most recent “Handling Sensitive Client Information” refresher because it’s clear that he ignored all of the things I’ve covered above. He is no longer an auditor with PwC.

The SEC’s complaint alleges that, through his audit work at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Mayank Gupta learned that San Jose, Calif.-based Cavium was making imminent preparations to acquire Aliso Viejo, Calif.-based QLogic Corp. According to the SEC’s complaint, before the deal was announced to the public, Gupta called his cousin-in-law Pushpendra Agrawal, and told him that Cavium was going to acquire QLogic and that QLogic was a “sure thing.” Upon arriving at work, Agrawal bought 200 QLogic call options, based on Gupta’s tip. During his lunch break, Agrawal bought an additional 50 QLogic call options, again based on Gupta’s tip. After QLogic announced that it would be acquired by Cavium through a tender offer, QLogic’s stock rose by more than 9 percent, and Agrawal profited by more than $23,785 from the illegal trades.

I love how the cousin-in-law couldn’t resist; “I’ll just buy 50 more options. Who’s going to notice?”

A PwC spokeswoman provided the following statement: “Mr. Gupta is no longer with the Firm. PwC is committed to safeguarding confidential client information and provides extensive training and education to its people on the importance of maintaining client confidentiality.”

Thanks for tuning in to this latest edition of “Big 4 Auditor Mishandles Sensitive Client Info.” We’ll see you next time.

[SEC]

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

PwC Australia is Very Very Sorry, You Guys

Presumably because the many apologies and decisions made before this letter have not sufficiently gotten the heat off their backs (and boy is it hot), PwC Australia published an open letter apology on their website Monday. The entire text, including the formatting, appears in below. At issue, if you make your residence under a rock, […]

sketch of a robot among business people to signify AI replacing workers

PwC Chief Products & Technology Officer Says Not to Worry, They Don’t Want to Replace You With AI

A couple days ago, NYT published a piece asking an important question: Who will protect the workers losing their jobs to AI? The article references a May 16 senate subcommittee hearing chaired by Senator Richard Blumenthal at which OpenAI’s Sam Altman is told Mr. Blumenthal’s greatest nightmare is AI causing massive job loss. ‚ÄúThere will […]