Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
October 1, 2023

Grant Thornton Let Off the Hook Big Time By UK’s Audit Cops

Back in August 2018, Grant Thornton UK was given a £4 million fine by the Financial Reporting Council (reduced to £3 million after a settlement discount) for a then-partner’s conflict of interest in serving on the audit committees of two audit clients, in addition to “widespread and serious inadequacies in the control environment in Grant Thornton’s Manchester office … as well as firmwide deficiencies in policies and procedures relating to retiring partners.”

The Evening Standard reported at the time that GT’s fine was the largest given to a non-Big 4 firm by the FRC. It was a pretty bad independence violation, deserving of a £3 million penalty.

Then, about two months later, news started spreading like wildfire in Britain about huge accounting irregularities found at cafe chain Patisserie Valerie, which resulted in Pat Val:

  • Going into administration, leading to 70 stores closing and more than 900 people losing their jobs.
  • Overstating its accounts by £94 million.
  • Having five people arrested and questioned in June 2019 about the accounting fraud, according to the Serious Fraud Office. Patisserie Holdings’ former finance director Chris Marsh was arrested and released on bail over the scandal in 2018.

And what firm audited Patisserie Holdings, the parent company of Patisserie Valerie? Grant Thornton.

The FRC announced in November 2018 that it would investigate Grant Thornton’s audits of Patisserie Valerie for the financial years ending 2015, 2016 and 2017. The results of that investigation were finally announced this morning, and it left us wondering how the FRC determines the financial punishments it doles out to accounting firms because sometimes they don’t make a whole lot of sense.

The Financial Times reported:

Grant Thornton has been fined more than £2.3m for a “serious lack of competence” in its audits of UK café chain Patisserie Valerie, which collapsed in January 2019 amid allegations of fraud.

If the auditors had done their job properly, they “should have identified clear indicators of the risk of material misstatement [of Patisserie Valerie’s accounts] due to fraud”, the Financial Reporting Council said.

The Financial Reporting Council also ordered the UK’s sixth-largest accounting firm to pay its investigation costs of more than £650,000, taking the total penalty to almost £3m.

Soooo, Grant Thornton got essentially the same fine from the FRC for an auditor independence violation as it did for giving clean audit opinions for a company at the center of one of the biggest accounting scandals in the UK in the last several years. Well. OK then.

Some people took to Twitter today to express their dismay at the wrist-slapping penalty Grant Thornton received from the FRC:

Lawson, a former shareholder of Patisserie Holdings, wrote about the penalties against Grant Thornton today in his blog, saying:

GT claim[s] that “our work did not cause the failure of the business”. At the end of the day that might have been so but if the defective accounts had been identified in 2015 or 2016 before the fraud became totally out of hand, perhaps the company could have been saved. It would certainly have saved me and many other investors from investing in the company’s shares after 2015.

The financial penalties for such incompetence are of course still trivial. Grant Thornton’s trading profit last year was £57 million.  

The FRC said Grant Thornton’s audit of Patisserie Holdings’s revenue and cash in particular involved missed red flags, a failure to obtain sufficient audit evidence, and a failure to stand back and question information provided by management.

In addition to Grant Thornton’s fine, the engagement partner on the Patisserie Holdings audits, David Newstead, was fined £150,000 but the penalty was reduced to £87,750, and the FRC banned him from carrying out statutory audits for three years. Grant Thornton said it would pay the fine for Newstead, who still works at the firm but is no longer a partner, according to FT.

The FRC also ordered Grant Thornton to review its culture of challenging clients in its audit practice and to provide the FRC with an annual report for three years on the progress of actions to improve its audit quality.

The report from the FRC is 65 pages, and all the gory details of auditor incompetence is included below.

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Related articles

a purple rose on wood background

Promotion Watch ’23: Grant Thornton Elevates 75 New PPMDs

Last Thursday, Grant Thornton announced the blessed naming of 75 new partners, principals and managing directors, 21 fewer PPMDs than 2022’s record class of 96. Although overall PPMD promotions are down, partner and principal promotions are up at 43 this year versus 38 in 2022. Let’s take a look at historical partner and principal promotions […]

Illustration of a person with a large fine

CohnReznick Gets Fined For Not Reporting an Earlier Fine to the PCAOB in a Timely Fashion

Yo dawg, I heard you like fines. The diligent paper-pushers at the PCAOB (the “P” stands for both paper and pushing) have sanctioned CohnReznick for failing to report key information on PCAOB Form 3 within the required timeframe. PCAOB Rule 2203, Special Reports requires any registered public accounting firm to file a special report on […]