In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
What’s the Next Move in This PCAOB Situation?
- Caleb Newquist
- July 1, 2010
Jonathan Weil over at Bloomberg has a new column up today and he is less enthusiastic about the Supreme Court decision in FEF v. PCAOB than say, everyone else.
JW is mostly wondering why we should keep having an “independent” PCAOB inside the SEC since the board members will now be at the mercy of the towing the political line inside the Commission, “While the court
PCAOB: Audit Firms Missing the Point of Auditing
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- May 20, 2014
Audit firms are still having some trouble pleasing the audit overlords at the PCAOB — […]
CohnReznick Is Probably Better at Audits Than You, Per PCAOB Inspection Report
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- April 23, 2014
Yesterday, we shared McGladrey's not-all-that-bad inspection report results. Now, it's time to crown a world […]
