In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
Grant Thornton Current and Former Partners Will Have a Seat In the PCAOB’s Penalty Box
- Jason Bramwell
- February 28, 2019
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board doled out suspensions to a current partner and a […]
The PCAOB Is Stoked Congress Gave Them Permission to Pick On China Now
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- November 30, 2023
Oh look, the PCAOB snagged more big fish: $7.9 million in total fines against three […]
If You’re Really Big Into Commenting on Five-Year Strategic Plans, the PCAOB Wants to Hear From You
- Jason Bramwell
- August 10, 2018
It’s been a slow day around GC HQ, and the weekend is almost here. But […]
