The United States relied more on tax revenue from wealthy individuals and families than other industrialized countries during the middle of the last decade, the Tax Foundation said Monday. Citing data released in 2008 from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, the nonpartisan group said that the ratio of what higher-income households paid in taxes compared to their share of market income was bigger here than in certain other countries. The richest 10 percent of American households paid a 45 percent share of the nation’s taxes in the mid-2000s, the OECD found, while having a 33.5 percent share of market income. That 1.35 ratio was higher than countries including Australia (1.29), Canada (1.22), France (1.1) and Poland (0.84). [The Hill]
Related Posts
After Filing Snafu, H&R Block Making It Up to Customers in Most Superficial Way Possible
- Caleb Newquist
- April 25, 2013
Kinda like a thoughtless relative or friend who completely forgot your birthday: “H&R Block appreciates that […]
This Tax Reform Stuff Can Wait
- Caleb Newquist
- November 1, 2011
[I]f we are going to make real progress, we can’t fixate on every overhyped, half-baked tax slogan that comes along. Sooner or later we must get back to basics. Here’s the main question: Should taxes be cut, raised, or reformed without changing overall revenue? The answer is that taxes should be cut in the short term, raised after we are clearly out of our cyclical downturn, and then reformed only after we have settled on the magnitude of tax increases needed for deficit reduction. [Martin Sullivan]
David Cay Johnston’s Plan to Save Social Security Has Some Really Big IFs
- Joe Kristan
- May 10, 2012
David Cay Johnston has a story with the counterintuitive headline "Social security is not going […]
