It looks like we’re going to be doing some copy/paste magic on our audit opinions for issuers. It looks like most of the changes are fairly minor (like moving the opinion first and adding the auditor’s tenure with the client to the letter). What about this critical audit matter stuff? Do you think it’s going to make investors nervous if we start airing the clients “challenging, subjective, or complex” issues on the face of the statement?
Related Posts
What do you think of PwC’s new casual dress code
- coconut_y
- May 20, 2016
All clothing is expected to reflect your professionalism. Avoid large logos or phrases that may […]
Tax vs. Advisory – There’s No Definitive Answer
- psg190
- September 4, 2014
MAcc graduate from a top tier program with a solid JD on the side. Hit […]
Quit After 8 Months
- Gnomeland_Security
- February 27, 2018
After school, I spent two years in public (mid-size firm) doing IT audit. In the […]
