It looks like we’re going to be doing some copy/paste magic on our audit opinions for issuers. It looks like most of the changes are fairly minor (like moving the opinion first and adding the auditor’s tenure with the client to the letter). What about this critical audit matter stuff? Do you think it’s going to make investors nervous if we start airing the clients “challenging, subjective, or complex” issues on the face of the statement?
Related Posts
Financial Due diligence firms
- dumdumdigadiga
- March 29, 2016
Besides, Big-4 firms, I was wondering what other firms have good reputations for FDD. I […]
Transaction Advisory Services
- MeowMix
- March 5, 2014
Can anyone explain to me what a day in the life of a TAS associate/senior […]
E&Y FSO Advisory Interviewing Experience
- James Raynor
- February 12, 2014
This is already after the fact for me already. But thought I'd contribute during my […]
