Hello and welcome to what is probably the last Monday news brief of 2024! Just popping in to wish everyone a Merry Christmas — or Happy Holidays, or Joyous Time Off From Fking Work, whatever you prefer — and let you know that we’ll be running repeat articles and shitposts this week (as usual really eh?) so we can take a nice break and will then put up some Best of 2024 stuff to get us through the end of the year.
For now, here’s some news I was able to scrape up.
Why are these PE firms circling professional service firms like birds eyeing up their prey? Plainly, the sector is struggling with flat profits and partner pay, with cracks starting to show at the bigger firms.
Even at the Big Four giants the cracks were visible, with headlines all year regarding swarms of layoffs across the businesses. This cold feeling inside the Big Four has yet to settle; their most recent batch results revealed each firm has a profitability problem.
Big 4 ≠ the firms private equity is gobbling up.
What are the PE firms getting out of it? According to the Department of Business and Trade, the professional and business service sector accounts for 12 per cent of the UK’s total economic output, with a collective turnover of £277bn.
“The sector is attractive because they are stable, non-cyclical businesses providing reliable workflows and revenue streams,” explained James Paton-Philip, a partner at Hill Dickinson told City AM.
They added that these firms can be “consolidated and merged with other businesses”.
And:
Another area the investment vehicles are looking to transform is in technology. The majority of professional services firms, especially the Big Four, are pumping extra financial resources into building out tech, with a spotlight on AI.
“Private equity firms are keen to invest in professional services firms that have a big potential to be transformed by investment in technology,” explained Fiona Czerniawska, CEO, Source Global
She added that “AI has significant potential in areas like audit, tax, and parts of consulting, and private equity firms are eager to be early adopters of this and other technology, get ahead of competitors in the market, and generate a good return on their investment.”
At least one private equity firm invested in accounting has fully revealed its playbook: Invest, grow, reduce the debits, offload. We are currently in the invest and grow stages of the cycle though the expense reduction stage may already be in effect at some PE-backed firms. In five or six years, market conditions willing, we’ll start to see PE dump their merged and purged practices (if they can find buyers).
The Securities and Exchange Commission today announced that Entergy Corporation, a Louisiana-based utility company, agreed to pay a $12 million civil penalty to settle charges that it failed to maintain internal accounting controls to ensure that its surplus materials and supplies were accurately recorded in its books and financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, from at least mid-2018 to the present, Entergy included materials and supplies at their average cost as an asset on its balance sheets. However, during this time, Entergy had allegedly been informed by its employees and management consultants that this asset included a substantial amount of potential surplus, including aged materials and supplies in excess of Entergy’s anticipated future use or exceeding the maximum stocking levels deemed necessary by its business units. According to the complaint, Entergy failed to establish a comprehensive process to review these materials and supplies to identify surplus, remeasure it, and record any differences between its average cost and remeasured cost as an expense, in accordance with GAAP.
“Internal accounting controls serve as a front-line defense in ensuring the accuracy and reliability of financial statements,” said Sanjay Wadhwa, Acting Director of the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. “Investors rely on public companies, such as Entergy, to ensure that adequate internal accounting controls are in place. We allege that Entergy failed to fulfill its obligation in this regard.”
The Albanese Government is today releasing a discussion paper on the use of legal professional privilege claims in Commonwealth investigations as part of the Government’s comprehensive response to the PwC tax leaks scandal.
Legal professional privilege is a fundamental tenet of our legal system but abuse of it can undermine investigations and erode trust.
The discussion paper tests key issues identified through initial consultation in the Government’s review of the use of legal professional privilege in Commonwealth investigations.
Around 100 stakeholders from across government, the legal profession, academia and industry contributed to the initial stage of consultation, jointly led by the Attorney-General’s Department and the Treasury.
Last year the Albanese Government announced a significant package of reforms in response to the PwC scandal.
We are cracking down on misconduct and rebuilding confidence in the systems that keep our tax system and capital markets strong.
The legal professional privilege discussion paper has been published to the website of the Attorney-General’s Department.
The TLDR is PwC attempted to cockblock the government from obtaining information it sought about the firm’s malfeasance and the government is still pissed about it. See also: Tax Office halved $1.4m PwC fine for false privilege claims [AFR, October 2023]
Houston-based Weaver leased and will renovate a full floor at the One Hughes Landing building, located at 1800 Hughes Landing Blvd. in The Woodlands, the company confirmed. The firm initially moved into an 11,087-square-foot space on the fourth floor of the tower in December 2023. Weaver will move into a new fifth floor space, totaling 26,031 square feet.
EY India has partnered with the National Association for the Blind (NAB) to create over 600 audiobooks, aiming to benefit more than 1,00,000 people with visual impairment across India. The initiative is part of EY Ripples program, where EY employees devote their time to SDG-focused projects, bringing together their combined skills, knowledge and experience to positively impact wider sections of the society.
Estimates are that 0.36% of the total population of India is blind (5 million people) and 2.55% are visually impaired (35 million people). In addition, India has approximately 240,000 blind children.
KPMG UK discusses generative AI in the financial and professional services sector:
AI and Generative AI (GenAI) are no longer a new phenomenon. For over a year, KPMG has been actively using and investing in an internal GenAI tool, seamlessly integrating it into ways of working and exploring possibilities of augmentation. Since making GenAI available to colleagues, the firm has seen a 15% boost in productivity over the last year and generated over 1.3 million prompts in just one month alone. [X]
There is no doubt that AI and GenAI will continue to transform the way people work. Across industries and functions, people are empowered to embrace new possibilities, performing new tasks and achieving remarkable results in a single day. This transformative shift unlocks large potential, driving innovation and business growth.
Over the next five years, the estimated boost to productivity by adopting Gen AI is 58% across support functions (e.g. HR, Finance, Customer Service and IT), 45% across control functions (e.g. Risk, Compliance, Internal Audit), and 44% across revenue functions (e.g. Sales, Marketing). Support functions are expected to gain the most from AI and GenAI, driven by the automation of bulk operational processes, user support via conversational dialogues, and code generation in IT. This means colleagues will free up more time to focus on strategic and business-partnering activities, as well as expanding the capacity and reach of their operations. While these statistics are FPS focused, the functions exist across all industries and similar impact is expected.
Who stands to benefit from this so-called boost in productivity, I wonder?
I hope everyone has a safe and restful holiday. If you need me, email or text any time. Text is best, my email is overflowing with idiotic PR pitches about the best cities in which to be a naked vegan (I wish I was joking) and other off-topic foolery. Love ya, mean it!
• Accounting convergence threatened by EU drive [FT]
Somewhat of a bombshell was dropped over the weekend when an EU politician suggested that funding for the IASB could be subject to its willingness to buckle to political pressure, according to the Financial Times. Michel Barnier, the EU’s new internal market commissioner would like ‘issuers – more banks and more companies – and more prudential regulators represented on the governing board [of the IASB],’ and suggested that it was too early to determine if the IASB’s scant budget of $6.5 million would be increased.
The FT reports that the EU pols “believe prudential regulators should be mor overnance so that accounting can be used as a tool for financial stability,” despite the feeling of other countries (e.g. U.S. and Japan) that accounting rules “should not be the subject of regulatory intervention but should focus on providing an accurate snapshot of a company’s value.”
This difference in opinion on what the purpose of accounting is could disrupt the convergence process which won’t do much to impress the G20 chaps who demanded some progress on the global accounting sitch.
• IRS Expansion [Factcheck.org via TaxProf Blog]
Those 16,500 new IRS agents you keep hearing about, or is 17,000? Whatever it is, Factcheck.org was posed the question about this small army of tax enforcers that will be marching into your home, heavily armed and stealing your freedom by forcing you to buy healthcare that you don’t want.
Are you prepared for this shock? Turns out, it’s not true:
This wildly inaccurate claim started as an inflated, partisan assertion that 16,500 new IRS employees might be required to administer the new law. That devolved quickly into a claim, made by some Republican lawmakers, that 16,500 IRS “agents” would be required. Republican Rep. Ron Paul of Texas even claimed in a televised interview that all 16,500 would be carrying guns. None of those claims is true.
The IRS’ main job under the new law isn’t to enforce penalties. Its first task is to inform many small-business owners of a new tax credit that the new law grants them — starting this year — which will pay up to 35 percent of the employer’s contribution toward their workers’ health insurance. And in 2014 the IRS will also be administering additional subsidies — in the form of refundable tax credits — to help millions of low- and middle-income individuals buy health insurance.
Plus, Doug Shulman testified before the House Ways & Means Committee that the Service will not be auditing individuals, rather, “insurance companies will issue forms [some possibilities here] certifying that individuals have coverage that meets the federal mandate, similar to a form that lenders use to verify the amount of interest someone has paid on their home mortgage. ‘We expect to get a simple form, that we won’t look behind, that says this person has acceptable health coverage,’ Shulman said.” So maybe this is what Anthony Weiner was trying to explain to Bill O’Reilly?
• Federal Prosecutors Leaning Against Charges in AIG Probe [WSJ]
If you were thinking that it would only be a matter of time before Joe Cassano was charged with pushing the financial apocalypse button, you’re about to be severely disappointed. The Journal is reporting — citing “people familiar with the matter” eight times or so — that the former head of the AIG Financial Products unit is not likely to be charged by the Department of Justice for deceiving PricewaterhouseCoopers about AIG’s exposure to credit default swaps.
The DOJ was initially under the impression that Cassano had not informed PwC about an adjustment that AIG had made to make the losses from the CDS look just horrendous as opposed to catastrophic. When PwC came back with a material weakness on AIG’s internal controls, they abandoned the adjustment. The DOJ’s investigation turned up some notes of a PwC auditor that show that Cassano had told the firm about the adjustment thus, covering his ass. The Feds haven’t officially made up their minds about charging Cassano but this element was considered a “central issue.”
Before you go!
Are you Looking for a fresh accounting career opportunity?
Going Concern now has thousands of open accounting jobs.
