Is KPMG Secretly Worried About This Phil Mickelson Insider Trading Situation?

There is an interesting article in BloombergBusinessweek today about some of Phil Mickelson's sponsors turning their backs on him due to Phil's insider trading probe.

As we already know, KPMG has expressed their utmost faith and support for Phil, saying "We have had a very strong relationship with Phil for a number of years, and we fully expect it to continue. We have great respect for him.”

For Phil Mickelson, it may not be that easy:

“Insider trading is about cheating, and golf is about not cheating,” said Atlanta-based sports attorney David Cornwell, who has defended athletes including baseball players Alex Rodriguez and Ryan Braun, and quarterback Ben Roethlisberger of the Pittsburgh Steelers, in separate scandals.

Another big sponsor, Callaway, echoes KPMG's statement:

“We have had a long-standing partnership with Phil and value our relationship with him,” Carlsbad, California-based Callaway said in a statement. “He has always acted with the utmost professionalism and integrity in our dealings with him.”

Because the issue involves investing and not golf, Callaway doesn’t stand to suffer much damage, Casey Alexander, a New York-based analyst at Gilford Securities Inc., said in a telephone interview.

“Callaway would stick behind him until they slammed the jail cell door shut,” Alexander said. “There’s such a degree of public goodwill towards Phil, people will say he’s innocent until proven guilty.”

Last I checked, Casey Alexander, New York-based analyst at Gilford Securities, Phil is innocent until proven guilty regardless of his so-called "public goodwill," but thanks for that insight.

Anyhoo, sports attorney David Cornwell is a tad skeptical Phil's big sponsors are as supportive behind the scenes as their public statements make it appear:

“Despite what Barclays and KPMG may say, you’ve got to know that they are watching this thing closely,” Cornwell said. “For the financial services companies, that’s just a blemish they can’t afford to have.”

Phil earns more than $30 million a year in sponsorships, so this naturally begs the question why a squeaky clean, trustworthy dude like Lefty would profit from information he knew was non-public and material to the company in question.

As for his reputation, I don't think he's all that worried. Even in the age of villifying banksters and crooked politicians, and even without any proof Phil did anything wrong, some have even gone so far as to call him a hero. A hero! Lord knows KPMG could use more of those.

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

This Is Not Good, KPMG. Not Good At All.

Here’s some less-than-stellar news about the Queen’s KPMG from today’s Financial Times: KPMG faces a record fine of more than £15m after advising bed manufacturer Silentnight on the sale of its business despite the accountant’s “conflict of interest” with the buyout fund that bought it. An independent tribunal found that KPMG and one of its […]

KPMG Poaches Someone From PwC and Issues a Press Release, Part XIV

Andrew Yates has put together a squad—six men (including Yates) and six women—who will act as his right hand when he takes over as CEO of KPMG Australia on July 1. One of the members of KPMG Australia’s new National Executive Committee is a recent refugee of PwC, according to a press release: External hire, Dorothy […]