Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

KPMG Director’s Thoughts On Firm’s ‘Unethical’ Vaccine Policy Will Be Loved By Some and Hated By Others

Once Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson began rolling out their COVID-19 vaccines in the US, unless you had your head in the sand for the past four or five years, you just knew people would take sides on whether or not to get the jab—for whatever reason. And that has certainly been the case.

But from our perch on the fringes of the accounting profession, what we were waiting for was how the largest public accounting firms in the land would address Rona vaccines and whether they would put any type of mandate in place for employees to go back into the office or to client sites.

Sure enough, starting in late August, new vaccine policies starting trickling out at the Big 4—first at Deloitte, then at KPMG, PwC, and EY. At KPMG, management told employees that the firm would require proof of vaccination or a negative COVID-19 PCR test administered within 72 hours prior in order to enter a KPMG US office, effective Oct. 4.

Then the Biden administration yelled from the mountaintops that businesses with 100 or more employees had until Jan. 4, 2022 to make sure their staff are either vaccinated against COVID, or submit a negative test weekly before entering the workplace, according to CNBC. Unvaccinated employees were supposed to begin wearing masks indoors at the workplace on Dec. 5.

But OSHA put the breaks on enforcement and implementation of the requirements last month, after the US Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit halted the policy pending review, according to CNBC. Judge Kurt D. Engelhardt, in an opinion for a three-judge panel, said the requirements were “fatally flawed” and raise “serious constitutional concerns.”

While this all plays out in court, one KPMG director in Houston had to get something off his chest about the firm’s vaccine policy. In a post on LinkedIn Dec. 3, Casey Hinson wrote that during a recent webcast, “our CEO [Paul Knopp] said that our firm wants to be the most inclusive place to work, where everyone feels welcome. He then explained (and I am paraphrasing) that we have to discriminate against certain people because the federal government told us to, implying that we make too much money from them to not comply.”

He also wrote that “my firm has instructed me (through countless hours of ethics and integrity training) to speak up with courage when something does not align to our values.” The vaccine policy obviously isn’t something Hinson agrees with, as he continued: “My advice to my leadership is to follow the values you state you have. Do not comply or even say you will comply. Maybe you are playing a game of chicken, thinking the rules will die out in the courts, but in the meantime you are causing people duress and hardship in their personal lives and sending a message to younger generations that it is ok to be unethical if you make enough money and you can blame it on someone else.”

Hinson’s full post is below. And he hasn’t deleted it:

Whether you like or don’t like what he wrote, I think we can all agree that the dude’s got some balls calling out his employer in a public forum like LinkedIn.

9 thoughts on “KPMG Director’s Thoughts On Firm’s ‘Unethical’ Vaccine Policy Will Be Loved By Some and Hated By Others

  1. What a whiney little b*tch.

    Don’t want the vax? First, you’re an idiot. Second, you can still just get regular tests and come into the office! The policy allows for that!

    And I don’t think this is all that brave. He didn’t say anything that’s going to get him fired.

    1. No, you have to have the vaccine to my January in order to come into the office unless you applied for and received an approved medical or religious accommodation.

    2. The new policy does not allow for testing only. You have to be vaccinated, test, AND mask to visit any KPMG office beginning January 2022.

  2. Given that Big 4 professionals are solidly in the “laptop class” that have been working from home and less directly affected by the government response to COVID, I suspect his view is in the minority, but still represents a sizable minority, particularly in places like Texas and Florida that have largely rejected the restrictions.

  3. Give me a fucking break. Stop watching Fox News, Casey. I hope you get a Herman Cain Award for being such an entitled prick.

  4. Casey, you’re a professional. You’re not an EMT, a school teacher, a police officer, or a nurse. Go find another Fortune 100 employer without a vax mandate. There aren’t any. But you singled out your firm for your aggravations. You did it on LinkedIn. You strike me as someone used to hearing the word “yes” most of the time. Your public outcry at hearing “no” evinces that. Speak up doesn’t mean trash your firm on social media. It means handle things through channels, take personal accountability for doing so, and for abiding their policy decisions. Your thousands of peers will appreciate you not compromising the reputation that they work every day to support and enhance. You let down your team through your choice of grievance forum. You’re embarrassing yourself and everyone who works beside you to support your clients. Get a grip.

  5. Hey Anonymous, why not show your name? Are you scared? I’m not. I’d be happy to meet up with you any time and have a conversation.

    All I did was state the facts along with my opinion of the actions. If that makes the firm look bad, then maybe they should’ve made a different decision.

    If it makes me look bad, then I’m ok with that. I’m not doing this for me. Remember that, Anonymous.

    Casey Hinson

Comments are closed.