Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

How are Performance Ratings given out?

Just wondering on how this rating system work.

I know a few facts (from peers and managers):

  • You are compared to your ranks/peers (associates will be compared to associates, seniors, with seniors)
  • There are always "below average" (4 at KPMG) and/or "low" (5) performance grades that are handed out.

How about "1"s? Are those always given out as well? If we take the bell curve approach, if you always have people in Ds or Fs, you are bound to have A's as well, right?

Also, do they consider past years groups and compare them with present years group? Example, if you have a fantastic performer in a past year who got a "1", and this year's crop's best performer doesn't really match up to the last one, would that person get a 1 or would it be a 2?


Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

Firm That Calls Itself the ‘Construction CPAs’ Did Not Make the List of the Top 50 Construction Accounting Firms

Up until last year, there hadn’t been an actual ranking of the best independent construction accounting firms. But trade magazine Construction Executive is into that sort of thing, I guess. For its latest report, which of course has a pandemic-related theme, Construction Executive used an algorithm that weighed seven factors in descending order of importance […]

TIL: There’s a Ranking of the Top 50 Construction Accounting Firms

The editors at Construction Executive must have been desperate to fill their editorial calendar for 2019 because the trade magazine just came out with its inaugural ranking of the top 50 accounting firms that provide services to construction clients. Here’s all the work Construction Executive did to come up with its first-ever accounting firm listicle: […]