Britain's audit regulator, the Financial Reporting Council's accountancy and actuarial discipline board (AADB), has decided that even though its fine of £1.4 million of PwC in January was a record, it really didn't satisfy as a "credible deterrent." Accordingly, the AADB is floating some ideas on how to make the fines a little less "meh" by asking the tribunals that assess fines to "[give] formal guidance on setting fines […] reducing their dependence on precedents set by previous cases that might be as much as two decades old." Of course, even if the AADB had assessed the penalty it wanted, it would have amounted to just over 1% of PwC's UK revenues of £2.4 billion; a wrist slap that would have left a bit of red mark as opposed to no mark at all. [FT]
Related Posts
Unsurprisingly, Firms Did Not Totally Rat Themselves Out to the UK Audit Regulator About Exam Cheating
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- December 21, 2022
Exam cheating has been a hot topic in audit ever since EY got fined a […]
Audits Are a Joke and Here’s Why According to a Salty Old Industry Veteran
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- April 22, 2024
Ed. note: By “salty” I mean in the experienced sailor/pirate way, not the modern definition […]
Here’s the Deck EY Put Together to Sell the Audit/Consulting Split to Staff
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- August 19, 2022
Australian Financial Review has published slides shown to EY staff in a July global webcast […]
