Britain's audit regulator, the Financial Reporting Council's accountancy and actuarial discipline board (AADB), has decided that even though its fine of £1.4 million of PwC in January was a record, it really didn't satisfy as a "credible deterrent." Accordingly, the AADB is floating some ideas on how to make the fines a little less "meh" by asking the tribunals that assess fines to "[give] formal guidance on setting fines […] reducing their dependence on precedents set by previous cases that might be as much as two decades old." Of course, even if the AADB had assessed the penalty it wanted, it would have amounted to just over 1% of PwC's UK revenues of £2.4 billion; a wrist slap that would have left a bit of red mark as opposed to no mark at all. [FT]
Related Posts
This ‘Fighting Fraud’ Video from the CAQ Isn’t Going to Help That Expectations Gap Problem Auditors Love to Complain About
- Caleb Newquist
- April 4, 2013
Most people like to learn in some sort of visual fashion. Reading? BORING. Lectures? AWFUL. […]
Auditors Reminded That If They Keeping Screwing Up, They’ll Be Making the CAQ’s Job a Lot Harder
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- December 5, 2014
Auditors, consider this your friendly reminder not to fuck things up this busy season. Just […]
Let’s Give KPMG a Golf Clap For Finally Figuring Out How to Audit Their Way Out of a Paper Bag
- Going Concern News Desk
- January 28, 2025
On January 23 Bloomberg Tax published a surprising headline: “KPMG Slated to Post Best Audit […]
