Britain's audit regulator, the Financial Reporting Council's accountancy and actuarial discipline board (AADB), has decided that even though its fine of £1.4 million of PwC in January was a record, it really didn't satisfy as a "credible deterrent." Accordingly, the AADB is floating some ideas on how to make the fines a little less "meh" by asking the tribunals that assess fines to "[give] formal guidance on setting fines […] reducing their dependence on precedents set by previous cases that might be as much as two decades old." Of course, even if the AADB had assessed the penalty it wanted, it would have amounted to just over 1% of PwC's UK revenues of £2.4 billion; a wrist slap that would have left a bit of red mark as opposed to no mark at all. [FT]
Related Posts
As KPMG UK Gets Hit With a Record Fine, the Boss Admits the Auditing Was “Very Bad”
- Going Concern News Desk
- October 12, 2023
The saga of KPMG and collapsed client Carillion has finally come to a close with […]
Congratulations, Audit Managers, You Made Glassdoor’s 25 Best Jobs List
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- January 28, 2015
We're used to "accountant" making stupid lists from Yahoo on the world's best careers but […]
FRC To Determine Whether Missing a £30 Million Overstatement Was, In Fact, Bad Auditing
- Going Concern News Desk
- June 9, 2026
The Financial Reporting Council announced today that they’re officially investigating PwC UK’s 2024 audit of […]
