Britain's audit regulator, the Financial Reporting Council's accountancy and actuarial discipline board (AADB), has decided that even though its fine of £1.4 million of PwC in January was a record, it really didn't satisfy as a "credible deterrent." Accordingly, the AADB is floating some ideas on how to make the fines a little less "meh" by asking the tribunals that assess fines to "[give] formal guidance on setting fines […] reducing their dependence on precedents set by previous cases that might be as much as two decades old." Of course, even if the AADB had assessed the penalty it wanted, it would have amounted to just over 1% of PwC's UK revenues of £2.4 billion; a wrist slap that would have left a bit of red mark as opposed to no mark at all. [FT]
Related Posts
Mazars and Armanino Just Abruptly Stopped Working For Crypto Clients
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- December 16, 2022
Two things to share today. First, Mazars has “paused” crypto work effective immediately. Reports WSJ: […]
After Lifetime Ban on PwC Auditors, India Regulator Is Definitely Done With Satyam
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- April 24, 2014
The Indian Express: The chapter of Satyam scam is finally set to close as far […]
Ready or Not: Auditors Descend on Department of Defense
- Megan Lewczyk
- December 11, 2017
It’s not as cool as a multi-ship C-17 formation dropping paratroopers as a part of […]
