Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Audit Firms Being More Audit Firm-y in Response to the PCAOB’s Disappointment in Their Audits

Colin buried this in ANR this morning but I'm pulling it out and tossing it at you all like a zookeeper flings raw meat at his wild tigers ifyoufeelme.

Emily Chasan writes in CFO Journal:

This year, financial executives say their external auditors are requesting far more documents and details than usual on everything from pension assets to management reviews. As companies rush to close their books on 2013, they say these new and unanticipated demands are adding time, cost, and confusion to the audit process.

The more rigorous audits are in reaction to an alert from the government’s accounting watchdog. In October, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board warned that it had found “high levels of deficiencies” in audits of internal controls. These controls act as a company’s first line of defense against fraud and financial misstatements.

Here we go with this shit again. QUICK, everyone find more documentation before those clowns at the PCAOB show up! Surely that will improve audit quality.

It pains me to do this because I hate to encourage him to continue spewing his precious opinion (just kidding, bro, no harm), but Big4Veteran had a related comment recently about the firms' commitment to doing the same old shit they've always done until it is no longer possible to do so:

Excellent point re: the Big 4 firms being behind the ball on recognizing and adapting to changing business cycles. I agree with you. I've said in the past the the biggest problem with the Big 4 accounting firms is that they're run by a bunch of accountants, not visionary business leaders. They are usually much more reactive than proactive. This is why they always seem to be badly overstaffed when the economy is slow and badly understaffed when there are a lot of growth opportunities. By the time they eventually adapt, the economic climate has changed again. The firms are huge, bloated organizations that do not see what's on the horizon in order to change course effectively or timely.

This applies to more than just hiring, ask that SALY chick what I mean.

Sooooo… if audit firms are jumping all over themselves to do better audits (whatever that means), does that mean their beloved methodologies weren't so hot to begin with?

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

nuclear blast

WTF Happened at SVB and Should KPMG Auditors Have Seen It Coming?

While the general investing public is asking “where were the auditors?” in regards to the recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank, the banks’ auditors are insisting that, having exercised requisite due professional care, their unqualified opinions were based on the information available to them at the time and as such, the firm […]

"top secret" file folder

PwC UK Fined £7.5 Million For Faking Evidence and Other Such Terrible Auditing of a Government Contractor

The Financial Reporting Council has fined PwC £7.5 million ($8.9 million USD) for work related to Babcock, a multinational corporation headquartered in the UK providing, among other things, engineering services. Babcock conducts most of its business with the government, particularly the Ministry of Defence (don’t @ us, that’s how they spell it across the pond). […]