It looks like we’re going to be doing some copy/paste magic on our audit opinions for issuers. It looks like most of the changes are fairly minor (like moving the opinion first and adding the auditor’s tenure with the client to the letter). What about this critical audit matter stuff? Do you think it’s going to make investors nervous if we start airing the clients “challenging, subjective, or complex” issues on the face of the statement?
Related Posts
Being Honest as an Interviewer
- Another Guest
- May 18, 2016
There have been multiple questions posted lately about being honest on applications and the ethics […]
Financial Due diligence firms
- dumdumdigadiga
- March 29, 2016
Besides, Big-4 firms, I was wondering what other firms have good reputations for FDD. I […]
Big4 NY Interview – Potential Awkward Situation
- Karen
- April 3, 2017
I’m a 3rd year senior at a regional NY firm, I have an interview with […]
