It looks like we’re going to be doing some copy/paste magic on our audit opinions for issuers. It looks like most of the changes are fairly minor (like moving the opinion first and adding the auditor’s tenure with the client to the letter). What about this critical audit matter stuff? Do you think it’s going to make investors nervous if we start airing the clients “challenging, subjective, or complex” issues on the face of the statement?
Related Posts
What type of work would an intern be doing in Forensics with Big 4?
- Free_Lunches
- October 6, 2014
I've been talking to a Big 4 firm about their forensics practice and I feel […]
Internal Audit to Operations
- memmy29
- May 24, 2016
I went right into Internal Audit after obtaining my CPA license. I should have gotten […]
Thoughts on Writing for GC
- Tim Gordon
- May 1, 2014
Ed. note: I think we have a new writer submission? Or perhaps just a warning […]
