In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
Idiot Who Backdated Work Papers Will Never Work in This Town Again
- Going Concern News Desk
- September 14, 2022
The PCAOB is busy sniffing out poor audit behavior to remind everyone to be on […]
The PCAOB Is Sorry for the Mess
- Caleb Newquist
- March 21, 2013
With PwC CAKEgate in the rearviewmirror, the PCAOB appears to have taken a look around […]
KPMG Bermuda’s Head of Ethics Fined By the PCAOB For Being Unethical
- Jason Bramwell
- April 10, 2019
Here’s a fun story of what not to do if you’re an ethics director at […]
