In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
The PCAOB Chairman Is Still Talking About Auditor Rotation
- Caleb Newquist
- February 19, 2013
Generally speaking, there are two camps when it comes to the idea of auditor rotation […]
ICYMI: 40-Year EY Veteran Picked to Chair the PCAOB
- Going Concern News Desk
- February 5, 2026
Goodbye George Botic, hello Demetrios (Jim) Logothetis. On Friday, the SEC announced a new crew […]
If the PCAOB Thinks Firms are So Deficient, Can We Rely on Audits or Not?
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- October 1, 2013
A nearly 40% "deficiency" rate for the big firms according to the PCAOB is news […]
