In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
You Can Officially Check “Updated COSO Internal Control – Integrated Framework” Off Your Wish List
- Caleb Newquist
- December 19, 2011
Another Festivus miracle! The Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) – an […]
The PCAOB Has Had It With Shoddy Audit Work Performed by Affiliates
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- October 5, 2022
In its ongoing effort to tell audit firms that it means business this time for […]
PwC’s 2021 PCAOB Inspection Report Shows Once Again It Is Less Awful at Auditing Than the Other Big 4 Firms
- Going Concern News Desk
- December 28, 2022
The 2021 PCAOB inspection report season kicked off right before Christmas with the release of […]
