In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
PCAOB Settles With PwC Partner Who Screwed Up the ArthroCare Audit
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- July 7, 2014
Let this case serve as a lesson to all partners in charge: if you don't […]
PCAOB Fines Deloitte Canada $350,000 for Breaking Independence Rules Thrice on Audits of Banro
- Jason Bramwell
- October 16, 2018
Deloitte Canada scored a hat trick of sorts on Oct. 16, but I doubt it […]
Martin Baumann Found a Job at Another Auditing Standard-Setter With a Five-Letter Acronym
- Jason Bramwell
- September 17, 2018
Nearly four months after he left his position of chief auditor and director of professional […]
