In a recent survey of public companies assessing views on Sarbanes-Oxley a decade after its adoption, Protiviti also asked companies what they think of the PCAOB's recent suggestions that mandatory rotation might improve auditing. Nearly half of all survey respondents agreed that rotation would have a positive impact. Among large accelerated filers, Protiviti said 47 percent of companies were in favor of rotation, and 60 percent of nonaccelerated filers agreed with the idea as well. Even Protiviti was taken back by the numbers. “These results are somewhat surprising as it can be expensive and time consuming to change external auditors, and such an action would represent a very substantial change in the external auditor arrangements for companies,” the firm noted in its report. “Further, the limited number of global network accounting firms significantly restricts rotation options." [CW, Earlier]
Related Posts
The PCAOB Knows You’re Monkeying Around with Documents
- Caleb Newquist
- April 19, 2012
The PCAOB's Director of Enforcement and Investigations, Claudius Modesti, is on to your little game. You […]
Audit Leaders Use AICPA Council to Vent About ‘Crisis’ at Partner Level
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- May 17, 2012
Knowing you guys as well as I do, I realize it's pointless to bore you […]
Which KPMG Scandal Is Worse: PCAOB ‘Steal the Exam’ or CPE Training Exam Cheating?
- Jason Bramwell
- June 25, 2019
Since Monday when the SEC announced it had fined KPMG $50 million for not one […]
