Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
September 27, 2023

When CEOs and Audit Committee Members Are BFFs, Financial Statements Are Ps of S

Welcome to the latest edition of Accumulated Deprecation, Greg Kyte's monthly column. Go here to read more of Greg's posts.

Dutch people are assholes. In the United States, under SarBox, a 100 percent independent audit committee's good enough, but a group of Dutch researchers1 don’t even want CEOs and audit committee members to be friends.2

Here’s what they studied:

The three kinds of relationships the professors focused on were employment ties, educational ties and friendships from voluntary or leisure activities. While neither employment or educational ties were found to have a significant effect on company financial reporting, the researchers recorded the strongest correlation in the third group.

This correlation led them to the following conclusion:

Firms whose audit committees have "friendship" ties to the CEO purchase fewer audit services and engage more in earnings management. Auditors are also less likely to issue going-concern opinions3 or to report internal control weaknesses when friendship ties are present.

SOX says that every audit committee member must be independent. That means

Audit committee members are barred from accepting any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the issuer or any subsidiary thereof.


A member of the audit committee … may not be … a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the [issuer]."

But nothing in SOxley puts restrictions on Jamie Dimon’s bestie.

SOA-02 also mandates that every audit committee must have at least one financial expert. So it's pretty clear that at least one audit committee member has no "friendship ties." Financial experts are like yoga mats. Everybody's got one, but nobody really wants to spend time with it.

So what should be done?

One of the study’s researchers said, “Given the problems our study has revealed, the SEC in the U.S. and regulators in Europe should consider mandating the publication of social ties between top management and board members.”

Tough rule to follow for those who’ve slept their way to the top. Also, a hard rule to clarify.

Charles Elson of the Weinberg Center for Corporate Governance said it would be difficult for regulators to define social ties. “Is it one lunch a week, is it two lunches?”

There are, however, lunch, lunch-adjacent, and non-lunch circumstances that clearly indicate that a friendship tie does exist, like when a CEO and an audit committee member exchange friendship bracelets at summer camp.

Regardless of future regulation on friendship, financial reporting risk is reduced when friendship ties do not exist between audit committees and CEOs. Therefore, best practices dictate that CEOs should take the following steps to circumvent the formation of undesirable social relationships:

  • Make a concerted effort to sleep with audit committee members’ spouses
  • Deliver periodic board meeting nut taps
  • Assert that audit committee members’ pay is professional welfare

When you think about it, approximately half of all independence issues would evaporate with just a few more nut taps.

1 Technically, it was one Dutch researcher and one Belgian researcher, but since you can’t identify either country on a map, I’ll just call them both Dutch.
2 Care Bears is not broadcast in the Netherlands.
3 They generally have a very low opinion of Going Concern.



Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

Golden retriever puppy looking guilty from his punishment

BDO USA and Two of Its Audit Partners Got in Trouble and It’s Gonna Cost Them $2 Million and Change

Fresh off the PCAOB’s published naughty list, BDO USA and partners Kevin Olvera and Michael Musick got sent to the punishment corner for violations of PCAOB rules and audit standards in connection with the audit of AAC Holdings, Inc. (“AAC”) for 2017. Specifically, audit partner Olvera failed to properly evaluate three significant estimates that AAC […]

PwC Canada Totally Blew Their Perfect Score on PCAOB Inspections This Time Around

A few days ago the paper-pushers at the PCAOB released 15 new inspection reports and three expanded reports for the following firms: Inspection reports De Visser Gray LLP (Canada) Ernst & Young Limited Corp. (Panama) Frost, PLLC Harbourside CPA LLP (Canada) Keith K Zhen CPA Maggart & Associates, P.C Miller Wachman LLP PBMares, LLP PKF […]