[T]he tediously-reported proclamation of real convergence commitment has never been more than a smokescreen behind which the divergent interests of the Americans and the Europeans have knocked heads to the point of insensibility. (For which, recall the continued fudging of the SEC as to whether, if ever, that agency is even going to confirm a date certain on which to decide if to weigh in or not […].) Why no-one has called the question on this endless charade reflects the two-level fantasy in the dialog: the IASB and the FASB both pretend to believe in the desirability of fully-converged accounting standards, and the community of financial statement issuers and users pretend to believe them. [Re:Balance]
Related Posts
PwC Has Not Paid Its Interns (UPDATED)
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- July 10, 2023
Ed. note: we’re told the interns were paid the day after this post was published. […]
CohnReznick Co-CEOs Gushing Over Firm’s New Hat Like It Was the Best Thing to Come Out of the Merger
- Caleb Newquist
- October 10, 2012
Back in the spring, we learned that J.H. Cohn and Reznick Group would be welcoming […]
Let’s Review: Office Space, Insider Trading, Hashtags
- Caleb Newquist
- February 12, 2016
It's just another Friday during February so let's try to remember all the important things […]
