[T]he tediously-reported proclamation of real convergence commitment has never been more than a smokescreen behind which the divergent interests of the Americans and the Europeans have knocked heads to the point of insensibility. (For which, recall the continued fudging of the SEC as to whether, if ever, that agency is even going to confirm a date certain on which to decide if to weigh in or not […].) Why no-one has called the question on this endless charade reflects the two-level fantasy in the dialog: the IASB and the FASB both pretend to believe in the desirability of fully-converged accounting standards, and the community of financial statement issuers and users pretend to believe them. [Re:Balance]
Related Posts
#BusySeasonProblems: Late Nights with India; Enough M&Ms for Everyone; Awkward Moments with a Partner
- Caleb Newquist
- March 10, 2015
Once again, it's time for that time honored tradition of combing Twitter for the Internet's […]
Friday Footnotes: Deloitte’s Drunken Antics; KPMG Killing Grandma?; Social Ch-ch-change | 1.15.21
- Going Concern News Desk
- January 15, 2021
A Glass or Two of Red Helps Square the Numbers [Bloomberg Opinion] Good long read […]
Accountants Behaving Badly: Ex-Missouri CPA Would Have Made Bernie Madoff Proud
- Jason Bramwell
- June 14, 2021
Former Lebanon, MO, accountant Douglas Richardson found out on June 10 how long he’ll be […]
