[T]he tediously-reported proclamation of real convergence commitment has never been more than a smokescreen behind which the divergent interests of the Americans and the Europeans have knocked heads to the point of insensibility. (For which, recall the continued fudging of the SEC as to whether, if ever, that agency is even going to confirm a date certain on which to decide if to weigh in or not […].) Why no-one has called the question on this endless charade reflects the two-level fantasy in the dialog: the IASB and the FASB both pretend to believe in the desirability of fully-converged accounting standards, and the community of financial statement issuers and users pretend to believe them. [Re:Balance]
Related Posts
Deloitte’s DEI Goals Ended Up Slightly More Expensive Than Anticipated
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- August 26, 2026
Yesterday the Department of Justice announced a False Claims Act resolution with Deloitte, who have […]
Friday Footnotes: PwC Scandal Somehow Gets More Scandalous; Deloitte Denied in Court; Withum Embiggens in Florida | 11.8.24
- Going Concern News Desk
- November 8, 2024
Footnotes is a collection of stories from around the accounting profession curated by actual humans […]
Client That Fired Marcum Over Audit Quality Compares the Firm to a Doctor Killing Half His Patients
- Going Concern News Desk
- July 13, 2023
It may be called The Westerly Sun but this paper is throwing nothing but shade […]
