[T]he tediously-reported proclamation of real convergence commitment has never been more than a smokescreen behind which the divergent interests of the Americans and the Europeans have knocked heads to the point of insensibility. (For which, recall the continued fudging of the SEC as to whether, if ever, that agency is even going to confirm a date certain on which to decide if to weigh in or not […].) Why no-one has called the question on this endless charade reflects the two-level fantasy in the dialog: the IASB and the FASB both pretend to believe in the desirability of fully-converged accounting standards, and the community of financial statement issuers and users pretend to believe them. [Re:Balance]
Related Posts
Grant Thornton’s Philadelphia Office Gives a Purple Rose to Former Bachelorette Contestant
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- November 26, 2014
Where do you go in life after you've been eliminated from The Bachelorette? To Grant […]
We Think This Means PwC and EY Won’t Be Going Full RTO Any Time Soon
- Going Concern News Desk
- January 7, 2025
Shortly after the new year Fortune published an article about “how return-to-office mandates could change […]
Friday Footnotes: A World Without Accountants; GAO Finds a Big Mistake; ‘Fazbie’ | 8.5.22
- Going Concern News Desk
- August 5, 2022
Ed. note: are you obsessed with accounting news? Yeah, us too. Sign up for our […]
