[T]he tediously-reported proclamation of real convergence commitment has never been more than a smokescreen behind which the divergent interests of the Americans and the Europeans have knocked heads to the point of insensibility. (For which, recall the continued fudging of the SEC as to whether, if ever, that agency is even going to confirm a date certain on which to decide if to weigh in or not […].) Why no-one has called the question on this endless charade reflects the two-level fantasy in the dialog: the IASB and the FASB both pretend to believe in the desirability of fully-converged accounting standards, and the community of financial statement issuers and users pretend to believe them. [Re:Balance]
Related Posts
Head Regulator Said He’ll Break Out the World’s Smallest Violin For Auditors Crying About Tougher Regulation
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- April 7, 2023
Financial Times has reported that Financial Reporting Council head Sir Jon Thompson — who last year […]
PwC Reports Un-Chadly Revenue For FY24
- Going Concern News Desk
- October 31, 2024
PwC has announced global revenue numbers for FY24 (unaudited) and like their compadres at Deloitte […]
Friday Footnotes: The Joys of Accounting; Big Data; Empowered! | 1.17.20
- Going Concern News Desk
- January 17, 2020
‘Friendly Competitors’ Merge To Form New Boutique CPA Firm [The Newtown Bee] Two local companies […]
