A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
New SEC Rules Have Made GAAP Great Again (in Press Releases Anyway)
- Caleb Newquist
- August 29, 2016
For some time now, I've been featuring various worries by various people about non-GAAP reporting […]
SEC Fines Company for Failing to Mention That They Paid for CEO’s Lavish Perks (and Some Non-GAAP Stuff, Too)
- Caleb Newquist
- January 18, 2017
Normally I'd reserve mis-adventures in non-GAAP accounting for the news roundup, but it's not every […]
This 8-K From Valeant Is Something to Behold
- Caleb Newquist
- March 21, 2016
This morning, troubled drug company Valeant announced a restatement and that its CEO Michael Pearson […]
