A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
COSO Willing to Accommodate Anyone Who Hasn’t Been Able to Get the Hang of Things the Past Two Decades
- Caleb Newquist
- November 30, 2012
Auditors and companies looking to adhere to a proposed internal control framework for financial reporting […]
‘Little GAAP’ vs. Financial Reporting Framework: As a CPA, People Expect You to Know This Crap
- Greg Kyte
- August 27, 2013
Welcome to the latest edition of Accumulated Deprecation, Greg Kyte's monthly column. Go here to read more of Greg's posts.
GAAP is hard. I mean it was hard. But now accounting for private companies and small- and medium-size entities (SMEs) is super easy compared with just two months ago.
New SEC Rules Have Made GAAP Great Again (in Press Releases Anyway)
- Caleb Newquist
- August 29, 2016
For some time now, I've been featuring various worries by various people about non-GAAP reporting […]
