A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
“Emerging Growth Company” Still Trying to Get Its Accounting Figured Out
- Caleb Newquist
- July 30, 2012
Earlier today, a little bird pointed us to an 8-K filed by Ignite Restaurant Group ("IRG") […]
Weatherford International Gets in Trouble for Letting Execs Choose Their Own Numbers
- Caleb Newquist
- September 27, 2016
Going Concern history buffs will recall a period in 2011-2012 when oil services company Weatherford […]
That Time One of Donald Trump’s Companies Got in Trouble for Reporting Ludicrously Deceptive Non-GAAP Results
- Caleb Newquist
- March 15, 2016
Cretinous cheese puff and future American emperor Donald Trump likes to remind people of his […]
