A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
Overstock.com Stockpiling Gold Just in Case
- Caleb Newquist
- November 4, 2015
In case you've been pining for some Overstock.com coverage (oh, just admit it!), here's an […]
When It Come to Overcomplication, Accountants Take the Cake
- Megan Lewczyk
- July 28, 2016
According to Richard Thaler, “If you want to encourage someone to do something, make it […]
Weatherford International Gets in Trouble for Letting Execs Choose Their Own Numbers
- Caleb Newquist
- September 27, 2016
Going Concern history buffs will recall a period in 2011-2012 when oil services company Weatherford […]
