A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
Simplifying Financial Reporting Is Hard
- Caleb Newquist
- April 20, 2016
As a concept, business is simple. Someone willing to buy a thing or a service gives you money for that thing or service. If you sell lots of things or services then you’ve really got something good going. Hooray! You’re an entrepreneur.
Hertz’s Accounting Errors Get Worse, Could Get Worser
- Caleb Newquist
- May 15, 2015
Crappy car rental company Hertz's accounting problems are worse than they thought. The total errors […]
Companies Wanting More Liabilities on Their Balance Sheets Will Love the New Lease Accounting Proposal
- Caleb Newquist
- May 16, 2013
What's that you say, Hans? No one wants more liabilities on their balance sheet? […]
