A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
‘Little GAAP’ vs. Financial Reporting Framework: As a CPA, People Expect You to Know This Crap
- Greg Kyte
- August 27, 2013
Welcome to the latest edition of Accumulated Deprecation, Greg Kyte's monthly column. Go here to read more of Greg's posts.
GAAP is hard. I mean it was hard. But now accounting for private companies and small- and medium-size entities (SMEs) is super easy compared with just two months ago.
WFT Has Another WTF Moment with Its Tax Accounting
- Caleb Newquist
- February 21, 2012
Remember Weatherford International? That's the company whose internal controls (or lack thereof) led to $500 […]
Sorry, Lease Accounting Rules Don’t Care That You’re Trying to Keep Patients Alive
- Jason Bramwell
- September 24, 2019
The Wall Street Journal recently checked in with the CFO of Genesis Healthcare to see […]
