A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
This HP/Autonomy “Accounting Improprieties” Thing Hit the Big 4 Superfecta and Other Things We Learned Today
- Caleb Newquist
- November 20, 2012
As luck would have it, we don't get to coast this Thanksgiving week as HP […]
NASBA Happy to See Some Legit Options for Private Company Accounting Get Proposed
- Caleb Newquist
- July 10, 2013
I intended to get to this yesterday but I was having too much fun rummaging […]
ICYMI: Here Are Some Accounting Execs Talking About How Useless XBRL Is
- Caleb Newquist
- December 4, 2012
The mandatory use of eXtensible Business Reporting Language by large public companies began in 2009 […]
