A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
President Trump’s Latest Shower Thought Is to Eliminate Quarterly Reporting
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- September 16, 2025
Oh, that scamp! Trump truthed this yesterday: This isn’t the first time he’s shared this […]
SOX 404 Not Helping: Study
- Caleb Newquist
- April 29, 2015
A recent study by Sarah Rice of Texas A&M and David Weber and Biyu Wu of […]
Hertz Can’t Promise That Its Accounting Troubles Won’t Get Worse
- Caleb Newquist
- February 25, 2015
UPDATE: I relied on that figure provided by The Journal that incorrectly stated that the cost of […]
