A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
Financial Accounting Foundation Seems Slightly Annoyed with the AICPA’s New Accounting Method for Small Business
- Caleb Newquist
- June 11, 2013
Judging by the AICPA's PR blitz, you'd think that everyone was excited about their release of […]
Report: There’s Nothing Extraordinary About Sandy
- Caleb Newquist
- November 13, 2012
Companies are unlikely to be allowed to classify damage from Hurricane Sandy as “extraordinary” for […]
FASB’s CECL Standard Is a Disaster Waiting to Happen
- Jason Bramwell
- January 16, 2020
“A simple accounting standard is going to decimate the people in my district’s ability to […]
