Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
February 6, 2023

The SEC Would Like a Word With Long Blockchain

Iced Tea

Back in my day, it was enough to take an iconic cola brand and make a clear version to boost stock prices. Of course, that didn’t exactly work out for Pepsi in the long term either.

In December of last year, New York-based Long Island Iced Tea Corp. changed its name to Long Blockchain Corp. and everyone lost their collective shit. Directly following the name change, the company soared to a market value of $70 million for no other reason than, well, the name change because people are the worst. In February, NASDAQ announced it would delist the company, and it sits at a modest $5 million market value today.

Now comes news that the SEC would like a word with the drink maker.

According to Bloomberg, the SEC subpoenaed the company on July 10. In a regulatory filing this week, Long Blockchain said the SEC asked for certain documents, without elaborating further.

“The company is fully cooperating with the SEC’s investigation,” Long Blockchain said. “The company cannot predict or determine whether any proceeding may be instituted by the SEC in connection with the subpoena or the outcome of any proceeding that may be instituted.”

As Gizmodo points out, the SEC isn’t exactly thrilled about the idea of random companies slapping “blockchain” on their name just for kicks:

By the way, in a January address, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton told the audience that the agency might be looking into any company dumb enough to, say, change its name to “Blockchain-R-Us” and then sell stock without “providing adequate disclosure… about those changes and the risks involved”:

“I doubt anyone in this audience thinks it would be acceptable for a public company with no meaningful track record in pursuing the commercialization of distributed ledger or blockchain technology to (1) start to dabble in blockchain activities, (2) change its name to something like “Blockchain-R-Us,” and (3) immediately offer securities, without providing adequate disclosure to Main Street investors about those changes and the risks involved. The SEC is looking closely at the disclosures of public companies that shift their business models to capitalize on the perceived promise of distributed ledger technology and whether the disclosures comply with the securities laws, particularly in the case of an offering.”

It’s so ludicrous you wouldn’t believe a company would do such a thing but … well. Shoulda stuck with tea.

The Accounting News Roundup newsletter is back! Every Friday you’ll get a recap of recent content posted on Going Concern, On This Date in Going Concern History, list of hot remote and hybrid accounting jobs, and more. Sign up here today.

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Related articles

SEC Enforcement Released Its Greatest Hits for FY 2022

The SEC Division of Enforcement cracked a lot of skulls in fiscal 2022, as it brought in a record $6.439 billion in penalties and disgorgement, up from $3.852 billion in fiscal year 2021. Of that total, the $4.194 billion in civil penalties the SEC doled out was also a record, but the $2.245 billion in […]

a help wanted sign

The SEC’s Attrition Rate is Up But Is It Worse Than Public Accounting’s?

Answer: nope. POLITICO: The SEC has seen attrition rates jump from 5.4 percent in fiscal year 2021 to an estimated 6.4 percent in 2022 — the highest in a decade, according to the report, which began circulating late last week. The SEC is not unique in seeing employees depart. Attrition rates across the federal government […]