Judge Felt Compelled to Call Out Grant Thornton’s Extraordinarly Crappy Work

It's always amusing when a judge reprimands an accounting firm for sucking at its job. Usually it's due to some dumpster fire that auditors watched burn for too long, but today's bench slap came from a judge on Delaware's Court of Chancery in regards to some valuation work Grant Thornton performed:

Vice Chancellor Travis Laster blasted Grant Thornton's work in an opinion on Tuesday in a class action lawsuit by option holders against Caris Life Sciences Inc over its sale in 2011.

Laster found the tax advisory firm largely cribbed a report from rival PricewaterhouseCoopers, made "significant errors" on the work it did do and abandoned its prior valuation method to come up with numbers to satisfy a top Caris executive.

Here's the gist: Caris and its key shareholders wanted to avoid paying a ton of taxes that would result from a sale to another company, Miraca Holdings. Caris spun off two new units to shareholders and sold the profitable business to Miraca. The valuation of the new spun-off businesses needed to be low, so when GT came back with $200 million, the Caris CFO said, "Go back and try again":

Grant Thornton had valued the units in July 2011 at around $200 million, according to Laster. But in November 2011, after a discussion with Chief Financial Officer Gerard Martino, Grant Thornton used a new methodology and said the value was $47 million.

That lower valuation undermined stock options held by Caris employees, and Kurt Fox, who held options on 71,600 shares, brought a class action lawsuit on behalf of holders of Caris options.

What's kind of hilarious is that GT isn't even a defendant in the suit. But that didn't stop Laster from calling it a "new low" and that, "[GT's report] deserves separate mention because its contents were so flawed as to support both an inference of bad faith and a finding the process was arbitrary and capricious."

Be that as it may, GT is standing behind its work, saying, "we performed [the work] at the client’s request and based upon the information provided to us by the client."

Doubling down after a judge more or less says, "Your work is so sloppy that I can't believe you're not being sued for this," takes some balls, GT. Impressive. Very impressive.

Delaware judge blasts Grant Thornton deal advice as 'new low' [Reuters]

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

Grant Thornton Auditors Are Just Showing Off Now

It’s fair to say Grant Thornton auditors are no longer on the struggle bus. From 2010 to 2015, the Purple Rose of Chicago had an average audit failure rate of 44% in its PCAOB inspection reports during that time frame, including a whopping 65% worth of screw-ups in the firm’s 2012 report, which gave GT […]