The House Ways and Means Committee Is Still Mad at the IRS

GEEZ you guys, let it go already:

[T]he Ways & Means Committee went ahead today and approved H.R. 3865, the STOP Targeting of Political Beliefs by the IRS Act.  As its title suggests, this legislation will stop the IRS in its rush to implement these rules.  This allows Congress to continue its investigations, which have yet to benefit from the full universe of IRS documents.   

As Speaker Boehner has said, “The American people deserve answers, and we will continue to fight to get the truth – no matter how badly the Administration wants to sweep these issues under the carpet.

I have a serious question: wouldn't it just be easier to eliminate 510(c)(4) status for political groups completely? Seems a fair resolution, then everyone wins.

In 2012, Americans for Tax Reform spent $15 million on political ads. Or how about the deliciously ironically named Americans for Prosperity spending $36,352,928 that same election cycle? How is that "social welfare" and not straight up buying elections?

The "real" IRS scandal isn't alleged targeting of conservative groups, it's the IRS' muddy definition of 501(c)(4):

Types of Organizations Exempt under Section 501(c)(4)

Internal Revenue Code section 501(c)(4) provides for the exemption of two very different types of organizations with their own distinct qualification requirements. They are:

  • Social welfare organizations: Civic leagues or organizations not organized for profit but operated exclusively for the promotion of social welfare, and
  • Local associations of employees, the membership of which is limited to the employees of designated person(s) in a particular municipality, and the net earnings of which are devoted exclusively for the promotion of social welfare.

Homeowners associations and volunteer fire companies may be recognized as exempt as social welfare organizations if they meet the requirements for exemption. Organizations that engage in substantial lobbying activities sometimes also are classified as social welfare organizations.

Just do away with it completely for all political groups. Then political trolls hiding behind the guise of "social welfare" won't be able to hide behind the IRS' dress while doing their trolling.

That's not an assault on free speech, it's forcing these "social welfare" groups to classify their "free speech" as what it is, which is basically political intervention. Remove that variable from the equation completely and no one will be able to say one group got special treatment while the other is "muzzled" by the IRS. Problem solved!


Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Comments are closed.

Related articles

Where TF Is the IRS Supposed to Find 87,000 Agents?

While various factions bicker over the Inflation Reduction Act, we have one question: where is the IRS supposed to find 87,000 agents!? In case you haven’t heard or seen your aunt sharing Impact font memes about it, Senate Democrats want to throw some cash at the IRS (among other things not getting into here): The […]

CPA Firms That Referred Clients to Alliantgroup Have Been Subpoenaed, Asked to Turn Over 11 Years of Client Data

On May 20 the Houston headquarters of R&D tax credit consulting firm Alliantgroup was raided by the IRS, in the weeks since we’ve had plenty of speculation about the whys and we’ve heard countless accounts from current and former Alliantgroup employees about the “evil, toxic, and emotionally damaging company” that employed them. We’ve now learned […]