Oh my, there's a fight on the Internet, you say? Tell me more.
Memo to Paul Gillis PhD, CPA: Fraudsters need more apologists like you. $NQ
— Sam E. Antar (@SamAntar) November 20, 2013
Memo to Paul Gillis PhD, CPA: Your stupidity in trying to explain $NQ's DSO and cash numbers show how ignorant you are regarding fraud.
— Sam E. Antar (@SamAntar) November 20, 2013
Memo to Paul Gillis PhD, CPA: I'll debate you in any forum at any time regarding fraud. No softball questions from purported journalists.
— Sam E. Antar (@SamAntar) November 20, 2013
Future trolls of the world, please take note. Sam has just demonstrated how to call someone out on Twitter in the most incendiary way possible without having to resort to "your mom" jokes or bathroom humor.
Also, when a convicted fraudster calls you ignorant about fraud, you should probably take that accusation seriously.
Your move, Professor. *eats popcorn*
