Now that our elected officials have finished not doing anything about the budget and debt ceiling, they have ample time to get back to not doing anything about other things. Like tax reform!
Senator Max Baucus is the chairman of the Finance Committee meaning he's responsible for getting a bill out of the upper chamber. He's been pret-tay, pret-tay, pret-tay confident that he'll be able to get a bill together before he retires after his term ends, but as you may or may not know, tax reform is a delicate process.
You see, most people want tax rates to come down. That means less revenue for the government. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid is having none of that, that means getting rid of a lot of expenditures (i.e. deductions and credits). Most people think that's a worthy goal of tax reform also because tax expenditures are, broadly speaking, what make the code so mind-numbingly complex. No, really. For those of you that haven't taken a look at it, it's god-awful.
The problem with eliminating expenditures is there are large groups of tax lobbyists (we're still looking for a collective noun) working on the Hill to ensure their clients' precious deductions, credits, gaping loopholes, etc. are preserved. In other words, they and their clients prefer that the tax code is complex and they have the money and the access to prevent any meaningful tax reform from occurring.
Oh, yeah. It's a complete fuckshow.
To make matters even more complicated, this past summer, Baucus announced that the Finance Committee would be going with a "blank slate" approach to tax reform. That meant that all the provisions — even the most popular and entrenched ones — would be on the table for elimination. You can imagine how this could intensify the lobby frenzy that was already going on and it also got people wondering which deductions would survive the process.
Today, Baucus gave us a good indication of three biggies that aren't going to be touched:
Baucus, 71, said he’d like to get the top corporate tax rate into the ‘‘high 20s,’’ down from 35 percent currently, though higher than the 25 percent target set by his House Republican counterpart, Dave Camp. Obama has called for a 28 percent rate for most companies and 25 percent for manufacturers.Baucus said his plan would provide a ‘‘permanent solution’’ to U.S. international tax rules that encourage companies to leave profits outside the country."Frankly, the failure to do reform is hurting the economy," he said. "There’s no question of that."He was less specific about a rate target for individuals. Camp, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, has proposed a top rate of 25 percent, down from today’s 39.6 percent. "Look, it’s hard, because there are a lot of provisions that people like a lot, whether it’s charitable deduction or mortgage or state and local, whatnot,” Baucus said. "But, still, I do believe that we can dramatically simplify the code."

At a minimum, the Cain plan is a distributional monstrosity. The poor would pay more while the rich would have their taxes cut, with no guarantee that economic growth will increase and good reason to believe that the
[A McClatchy-Marist] poll reported that roughly two out of three registered voters — 64 percent — would be in favor of increasing taxes on annual income over $250,000. President Obama reiterated in his deficit-reduction speech last week that he favored allowing taxes to rise on families in that income level. Independents favored that plan of action at roughly the same percentage as the country at large, with more than eight in 10 Democrats also behind the idea. A majority of Republicans, 54 percent, opposed it. The poll was conducted both before and after Obama’s Wednesday speech, with support for higher taxes on wealthier Americans picking up afterward. Meanwhile, fully four in five registered voters oppose cutting Medicare and Medicaid. The House GOP’s fiscal 2012 budget, largely crafted by Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), makes fundamental long-term changes to both health entitlement programs, converting Medicaid into a block grant and turning Medicare into a type of voucher system. [