Skip to content
Saturday, August 22, 2026
Going Concern

When accounting goes unaccounted for

  • News
  • Big 4
    • Deloitte
    • EY
    • KPMG
    • PwC
  • Salaries
    • Latest Salary Articles
    • 2024 Accounting Salary Projections
    • 2023 Accounting Salary Projections
  • CPA Exam
    • 2024 CPA Exam Changes
  • Career
    • Remote Work
    • Career Advice
  • Jobs
  • Leadership
  • Advertise
  • Resources
    • Contact Us

Go Ahead and Ask Harry Reid if Tax Reform Can Be Revenue Neutral; Just Ask Him

Posted on July 25, 2013 by Caleb Newquist

Any tax overhaul “has to be under the total understanding that this can’t be revenue-neutral,” said Reid, a Nevada Democrat. “It can’t be even close to neutral. It has to be a significant tax target.” [Bloomberg]

Posted in TaxTagged all righty then, Harry Reid, significant tax targets, Tax Reform

Post navigation

Previous: Ernst & Young Trusts That Everyone Knows Those ‘Sexy Boys’ Aren’t Building a Better Working World
Next: Footnotes: McCain Wants Better Stripper Tips; Some Thieving Planned Parenthood Fool; Stop Shaming on Social Media | 07.25.13

Related Posts

  • IRS
  • Tax

Filing a Bogus $1 Trillion Lien Against IRS Employees Proved To Be an Ineffective Intimidation Technique

  • Caleb Newquist
  • June 17, 2010

Who knew!?

Oregon attorney Micaela Renee Dutson and her husband Tony Dutson were convicted of defrauding the U.S. Government of over $7 million but not before doing their damnedest to stave off the IRS and DOJ investigating them.


The Dutsons were a creative couple, selling “pure trust” packages to their clients who were told that their income would be tax free if it were placed in trust. They sold these products despite “several warning letters from the IRS, articles in the Oregonian newspaper warning the public against tax shelter scams, and a complstice Department on behalf of the IRS in an effort to stop them from selling their tax shelters.”

The IRS started auditing the Dutsons’ clients who, prior to engaging the dynamic tax duo, were seemingly compliant taxpayers. The IRS informed these clients that the “trusts” were actually illegal tax shelters and that they were being bamboozled.

This was, of course, unacceptable to the Mr and Mrs and they went on a serious offensive:

[T]he Dutsons began a campaign to obstruct the IRS’s audits and investigation, and to harass and intimidate the individual IRS employees who were auditing or investigating them. First, they created and presented dozens of fictitious financial instruments to the IRS purporting to pay off back taxes for themselves and a number of their clients.

Even though they knew the bogus instruments had no financial value and had never been accepted by a creditor, they continued to sell them to their clients with false promises they would pay off their tax liability. The Dutsons also advised clients to use them to pay off commercial debts, including mortgages and court-ordered obligations. Together, the Dutsons and their clients presented over $44 million worth of these bogus financial instruments over a four-and-a-half-year period.

To further obstruct the IRS, and harass and intimidate its employees, the Dutsons advised clients to file frivolous lawsuits against the IRS employees. The Dutsons charged their clients $3,500 each to prepare court documents and help their clients file them. They continued to advise clients to file these lawsuits — even after a federal court had dismissed the first of these suits as frivolous and without merit — without telling their clients about the dismissal.

After the Justice Department filed the complaint for a permanent injunction, and IRS special agents had notified the Dutsons in person that they were under criminal investigation, the Dutsons filed a $1 trillion lien in California against several IRS employees who had attempted to audit or investigate the Dutsons, as well as the DOJ attorneys who filed the complaint. A federal court later ruled that the lien was null, void and without legal basis, but one week later, the Dutsons prepared a $108 million lien for a client against John Snow, who was then Secretary of the Treasury.

The Dutson probably figured the jig was up and since $1 trillion is a nice round number the figured “why the hell not?!?” Back in the early ’00s a trillion was fantastical number (for the most part), not tossed willy-nilly like it is these days. The Dutsons could have filed the lien for $1 gabizillion and it would have made as much sense.

Oh and while they were at it, just file another one against the Secretary of the Treasury. If it was Tim Geithner, sure we can see that happening for a whole host of reasons but John Snow? Wasn’t he one of the most harmless cabinet members of the Bush Administration? If they would have filed the lien against Dick Cheney they could have garnered a little popular support at least.

Oregon Attorney Convicted of Tax Fraud After Filing $1 Trillion Lien Against IRS [Web CPA via TaxProf]

  • Tax

George W. Bush Would Prefer if the Bush Tax Cuts Were Called Something Other Than the Bush Tax Cuts

  • Caleb Newquist
  • December 14, 2010

As far as the policy is concerned, W is obviously cool with it but if the name could get tweaked (hint being: drop the “Bush”) maybe getting it through Congress wouldn’t such a BFD.

[via BI]

  • Tax

Let’s Just Call Everything We Don’t Like a Tax to Get People Upset

  • Adrienne Gonzalez
  • March 10, 2014

No one likes taxes, that much we know. So if you're raging against a particular […]

Accounting Jobs

The next generation of accounting jobs.

Accountingfly connects you with remote accounting jobs in the public and private sectors.

Visit accountingfly.com to find a remote job or to hire remote talent.

  • Remote Accounting & Tax Expert, AI Trainer

    Remote
    • Posted 10 hours ago
  • Remote Head of Tax

    Remote
    • Posted 10 hours ago
  • Remote Founding Tax Preparer

    Remote
    • Posted 12 hours ago
  • Remote Client Controller, CPA Firm

    Remote
    • Posted 12 hours ago
  • Remote Tax Accountant/Advisor

    Remote
    • Posted 12 hours ago
Load more listings

See all jobs>>

 

Useful Links

  • Jobs
  • Career Advice
  • Terms of Use
  • Contact Us
  • Submission Policies and Guidelines
  • Going Concern Community Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy

Jobs

  • Remote Accounting & Tax Expert, AI Trainer

    • Remote
  • Remote Head of Tax

    • Remote
  • Remote Founding Tax Preparer

    • Remote

Jobs

  • Remote Accounting & Tax Expert, AI Trainer

    • Remote
  • Remote Head of Tax

    • Remote
  • Remote Founding Tax Preparer

    • Remote

Career Advice

a cat looking quite mad

Daily Wire is Pissed Off About a PwC Career Program That Excludes White and Asian Candidates

  • Adrienne Gonzalez
  • February 7, 2025

Although this should have been on their radar already because PwC got sued by America First Legal over it two years ago, conservative muckraking site Daily Wire has just now…

guy giving double middle fingers

The Only Piece of Advice You Need to Survive Layoffs at Your Firm

  • Adrienne Gonzalez
  • August 7, 2024

Comment on "How are layoffs decisions really made?" via r/Big4 If it backfires so what, they were going to lay you off anyway. I really hope this advice gets sucked…

woman with glasses being interviewed for a job

Weekend Discussion: Let’s Talk Counteroffers

  • Adrienne Gonzalez
  • June 29, 2024

Earlier this week, a recruiter told me a story about a job seeker who was already employed but looking to jump elsewhere. She interviewed with a firm that really loved…

Advertise

  • Media Kit
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

DMCA.com Protection Status
Copyright © 2026 Going Concern

Before you go!

Are you Looking for a fresh accounting career opportunity?

Going Concern now has thousands of open accounting jobs.

Take a look – click here!