A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
Toshiba Restating, Concedes That Restatement Could Be Restated
- Caleb Newquist
- May 13, 2015
A "special task force" assigned by Toshiba Corp to look into accounting irregularities found that […]
BOOYAH! SEC Goes After TheStreet for Multiple Accounting Infractions
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- December 18, 2012
Hmm, wonder if Jim Cramer will mention this on his show tonight? The Securities and […]
Sorry, Lease Accounting Rules Don’t Care That You’re Trying to Keep Patients Alive
- Jason Bramwell
- September 24, 2019
The Wall Street Journal recently checked in with the CFO of Genesis Healthcare to see […]
