A paper presented in August at the annual meeting of the American Accounting Association in Anaheim, Calif., found that “the current Sino-phobic reaction to Chinese reverse mergers may be overblown.” In an effort to assess the performance of these often maligned companies, the study concluded that “as an asset class, Chinese reverse-merger firms (CRMs) have performed as well as or better than comparable firms already listed in the same exchanges in the United States. CRMs also perform much better than U.S. RMs on multiple dimensions, even after many CRMs were delisted or demoted due to recent scandals. The emerging picture is that, despite a higher incidence of accounting problems, the CRMs are more mature and less speculative than their U.S. counterparts.” [AT]
Related Posts
COSO Willing to Accommodate Anyone Who Hasn’t Been Able to Get the Hang of Things the Past Two Decades
- Caleb Newquist
- November 30, 2012
Auditors and companies looking to adhere to a proposed internal control framework for financial reporting […]
Not Choosing FRF for SMEs Will Be Even Easier Thanks to the AICPA’s New Decision Tool
- Caleb Newquist
- August 29, 2013
Are you a prudent business person staring at his/her five-line balance sheet thinking, "As a […]
Who Puts “USGAAP” on Their License Plate?
- Caleb Newquist
- May 14, 2015
It's nice to see a little national accounting pride, I guess: A few suspects: Christopher […]
