Britain's audit regulator, the Financial Reporting Council's accountancy and actuarial discipline board (AADB), has decided that even though its fine of £1.4 million of PwC in January was a record, it really didn't satisfy as a "credible deterrent." Accordingly, the AADB is floating some ideas on how to make the fines a little less "meh" by asking the tribunals that assess fines to "[give] formal guidance on setting fines […] reducing their dependence on precedents set by previous cases that might be as much as two decades old." Of course, even if the AADB had assessed the penalty it wanted, it would have amounted to just over 1% of PwC's UK revenues of £2.4 billion; a wrist slap that would have left a bit of red mark as opposed to no mark at all. [FT]
Related Posts
There Are Only Two Firms in Wyoming That Can Do Government Audits and One Can’t Do Its Job Because of Staff Shortages
- Going Concern News Desk
- January 8, 2024
Hey remember the Bloomberg story last March about how staff shortages at audit firms were […]
Audit ‘Reform’ in the UK: Hello … Is Anybody There?
- Jim Peterson
- May 14, 2021
It’s one thing to discuss the breadth of the UK government’s March 18 consultation paper, […]
Former Big 4 Audit Intern Pens Heartbreaking Tribute to Friend Who Died From ‘Overworking’
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- October 19, 2018
We’ve been heavy on the death and depression around these parts lately, and for that […]
