Since it’s Monday in late July (and many people probably had one old fashioned too many last night) we figured this day would have gotten off to a slow start. Well, we’re in luck! KPMG comes roaring out of the gate today with a little compensation update from none other call me Rudy” Veihmeyer and Henry Keizer.
The news? Well, the promotions bonuses have caused some belly aching so the boys thought they would give you a sneak peak at what you can expect come merit increase time:
Update on Our Plans for 2010 Compensation
A Message from John Veihmeyer and Henry Keizer
8:19 AM ET, July 26, 2010
In April, we told you that there would be compensation increases for the great majority of our people and, assuming KPMG meets its FY10 plan, higher bonuses than last year for EP performers, and bonuses for higher performing SP employees as well. Now, as we head into the fourth quarter, we would like to provide you with an update on this matter. As you view this information, please keep in mind that compensation increases are determined on an individual basis, and reflect each employee’s role, skills, performance, geography, and experience, among other factors.
· Merit and Promotion Increases – For employees who are not being promoted, we expect SP performers will receive merit increases that will range from the low to the mid-single digits; EP performers will receive increases up to the high-single digits and in rare cases double digits.
In addition to any merit increases, employees who have been promoted should expect to receive a promotion increase of approximately 5 percent, with one exception: newly promoted CSD Managers should expect to receive a promotion increase of approximately 10 percent.
· Variable Compensation – The FY10 pool for variable compensation will be more than double what it was last year. This means that EP-rated employees will generally receive bonuses that are significantly higher than those of last year. In addition, approximately the top half of our SP performers will also receive variable compensation awards.
Please keep in mind this information is preliminary. Final compensation decisions will be made based upon our full-year results, so the ranges above could be adjusted based upon our firm’s performance between now and September 30. But, consistent with our commitment to keeping the lines of communication open, we wanted to share with you our best current forecast about these important matters.
In line with our compensation philosophy and our focus on a high-performance culture, we remain committed to sharing the rewards of the firm’s financial performance with our employees and providing a competitive total compensation package that differentiates exceptional performers with superior rewards. As we have said before, the strong foundation we have built within the firm, as well as our near- and longer-term business prospects, make us very optimistic. But to finish this year strong and begin FY11 on a positive track, it is critical that we continue to drive a high-performance culture by doing our best work, providing the highest-quality service to our clients, growing our business, and operating efficiently.
Thanks again for your continued hard work and for all you do to help our firm succeed!
So now that you have that to chew on for your last Monday in July, feel free to discuss the “low to the mid-single digits” for the strong and “high-single digits and in rare cases double digits” for the exceptional. And if you’ve got thoughts on the variable comp pool, you can go there too, if you like. Keep us updated.
“tHeY oVeRhIrEd”
I thought that the profession is short on accountant talent, especially those who have 150 hours of accounting courses! No other places for these qualified accountants? I wonder if going to the 120 hours is really a Big 4 farce to make it easier to get accountants and keep starting salaries low.
Lots of talk re lowering education requirements – no talk re making salaries more competitive with other college majors, such as engineering.
I think it’s more accurate to say there is a shortage of “talented” accountants and there is no shortage of accountants.
The issue with this is that everyone wants the perfect accountant…this itself is highly subjective due to the breadth of the profession…but no one wants to pay them what it costs to get that accountant to spend the time and years to get to that point.
So the profession seems happy to eat its own tail to survive…but this is not and has not been a viable long-term solution.
totally agree with you on the requirements. And this is just the partners being greedy. low attrition rates cited as the issue? shouldnt that be a good thing? what a great message they are sending about the firm. shame on them for not creating opportunities or channels for the staff to grow. maybe with the increased flexibility the employees are taking longer to burnout now which used to work perfect for them.
“The cuts have focused on employees such as associates and managers, and included no partners”
I mean, naturally, you can’t cut any of the people actually responsible for making the mess in the first place.
so sad but true. i realized what the big 4 model entailed early in my career and ran. either you give your life in hopes to become a partner or you are a worthless worker bee that they will work to you burn out. then go grab new 21 year old grads to replace you.
Its a ploy to keep salaries low. Keep someone around for 2-3 years. They get to be too expensive. Hire new kids fresh out of college to keep salaries low and they do the grunt work while managers get to fix all their mistakes.
KPMG Proud
The beatings will continue until morale improves