November 29, 2021

LOL, PwC: For Once, KPMG Doesn’t Have the Worst Audit Failure Rate Among the Big 4

KPMG Rocks signs held by a woman in a KPMG shirt

Because it’s #TriviaTuesday, here are a couple of questions regarding PCAOB inspection reports:

  • When was the last time KPMG did not have the worst audit deficiency rate among the Big 4?
  • When was the last time KPMG had a lower deficiency rate than PwC?

The answer to the first question is 2013’s inspection reports, when KPMG had a failure rate of 46% but EY’s was worse at 49%. The answer to the second question is 2012’s inspection reports, when KPMG had the second-lowest deficiency rate at 34%, followed by PwC at 39% and EY at 48%.

But with the release of the Big 4’s latest inspection results by the U.S. audit cops last week, we can now update both of those answers to “2019’s inspection reports,” as not only did KPMG not have the highest percentage of failed audits reviewed by the PCAOB during its 2018 inspection cycle but its failure rate of 29% was lower than PwC’s 30% deficiency rate.

Of the 58 issuer audits of KPMG’s that were inspected, 17 weren’t up to PCAOB standards—most of which had deficiencies in both financial statement and internal control over financial reporting audits:

KPMG has been the butt of many jokes on this site for a long time in regards to its mastery of poor audit quality, but the House of Klynveld deserves some credit for cutting its percentage of failed audits by almost half since 2017:

  • 2010: 22%
  • 2011: 23%
  • 2012: 34%
  • 2013: 46%
  • 2014: 54%
  • 2015: 38%
  • 2016: 43%
  • 2017: 50%
  • 2018: 37%
  • 2019: 29%

The things that confounded KPMG auditors the most in financial statement audits were: failing to perform substantive procedures to obtain sufficient evidence as a result of overreliance on controls (due to deficiencies in testing controls), failing to perform sufficient testing related to an account or significant portion of an account or to address an identified risk, and failing to sufficiently evaluate significant assumptions or data that the issuer used in developing an estimate.

Inspectors dinged KPMG on the following areas of ICFR audits: failing to identify and test any controls related to a significant account or relevant assertion, failing to perform sufficient testing of the design and/or operating effectiveness of controls selected for testing, and failing to identify and/or sufficiently test controls over the accuracy and completeness of data or reports that the issuer used in the operation of controls.

Problems were most prevalent in controls involving revenue and related accounts and business combinations.

Here’s KPMG’s 2019 inspection report in full, if you’re into that sorta thing:

Related articles:

For Now, PwC’s Audit Quality Stinks
The PCAOB Needs to Just Beat the Sh*t Out of KPMG Already

Latest Accounting Jobs--Apply Now:

Have something to add to this story? Give us a shout by email, Twitter, or text/call the tipline at 202-505-8885. As always, all tips are anonymous.

Related articles

Black Friday Footnotes: Carillion Liquidator Wants Lots of KPMG Money; EY Can’t Handle the Truth; Mattel and PwC Settle with Investors | 11.26.21

Carillion Liquidator Seeks $336 Million From KPMG [Bloomberg] The U.K. government agency charged with liquidating Carillion Plc has lodged a claim at the high court against auditor KPMG, the Sunday Times reported. The official receiver has accused KPMG of negligence in its audit of the U.K. contractor and quantified claims of about 250 million pounds […]