Today in “fish my career out of the crapper,” a recent grad has started a masters program hoping to get into a speciality tax practice with a Big 4 firm. However, the reader is concerned that their program won’t be attractive the speciality groups. HELP!!
Have a question about your career? Worried that your porn star spouse might derail your path to partner? Need advice on broaching the subject of the shitty coffee in your office? Email us at advice@goingconcern.com and we’ll be sure that you get the help you need.
Back to our accountant-to-be in jeopardy:
I graduated from undergrad with a degree in accounting in April of this year and immediately began a masters of accountancy program in the Boston area. I did not have an internship since I chose to study abroad instead. I am fluent in Korean, and am interested in tax issues encountered by expatriates and multinational corporations. I am also interested in valuations for M&A. I have wanted to work in a Big 4 or other large accounting firm in the business advisory or tax divisions. However, looking at the job requirements for the positions in these two divisions, the firms prefer students with degrees in economics, finance, taxation, and even JDs and LLMs. My program, on the other hand, is more of a general accounting program geared towards auditing and preparing students for the CPA exam. So, my question is, “how can I get a job in tax or advisory–preferably dealing with tax issues–without experience or a ‘preferred’ degree?” The simple answer would be to just apply and point out the interests that I have, but would this accomplish anything more than alienating myself from potential employers and positions in assurance that could get me in the door and eventually onto the career path that I desire?
While your advanced degree will help your chances with the Big 4, we are wondering why you didn’t go with a program that would have allowed you to pursue a tax concentration, since that is your primary interest.
But never mind that, the issue at hand is how you get into these specialty groups without experience or a preferred degree. The answer is: it will be tough. You do have the advantage of being bilingual which will be extremely attractive, especially for any international speciality groups. If you can land a tax position, leverage this strength and communicate your interest in areas of expats and multinational issues. If you’re feeling really ambitious and learning a new language is easy for you, consider picking up a little Mandarin or Japanese to give you an even bigger advantage over your peers.
That may sound crazy but it will make you stand out from other people competing for these sexier jobs in specialty tax and advisory and like you said, if you just have a plain-Jane Masters and not the ideal background, you’ll need to make yourself stand out somehow. These groups are small and they don’t take on many new hires and yes, they do prefer people with the degrees you mentioned.
You also ask, “would this accomplish anything more than alienating myself from potential employers and positions in assurance that could get me in the door[?]” Again, if you’re interested in tax, why are you thinking about interviewing for audit positions? It will make your path to the speciality groups longer and even more difficult. Only pursue this if it’s the last resort.
Get into the tax practice if you can and go from there; your interest in international groups will seem less self-serving. You’ll probably have to do some time in compliance but that will serve as a good foundation for your career goals.
I’ve called bullshit many times before on the supposed “talent shortage crisis” in accounting. Now would seem to be a good time to call bullshit again. I continue to contend that any company in America can fill any accounting position with a qualified candidate in a reasonable period of time if the company is willing to pay the market rate for said talent. The real crisis is the assholes who run businesses thinking that accountants aren’t worth the money.
I’ve also said before that the high turnover at public accounting firms (even if just a little lower than normal), is not a bad thing. It’s a good thing. It’s good for the firms because it allows them to continue to promote the people who stay and also bring in fresh talent. And its good for the staff because the high turnover is an indicator that their skills and experience are in high demand in private industry.
I’ve started emailing media contacts to ask for salary numbers if they aren’t readily available any time an entity claims they can’t find accounting talent.
screw the Big 4
They screw their staff
The industry model needs to change. The folks entering PA don’t see value in the hours they are forced to work vs. the pay. Consider an imputed hourly rate that equates with a job at Walmart! Not to mention, in an era of immediate gratification, why would associates and even managers aspire to be partners. Making partner doesn’t carry the prestige it once did. Its like winning a pie eating contest with the prize being more pie.