Local Man Offers Terrible Advice to Desperate New Mexico Taxpayers

Posted on by Adrienne Gonzalez
never lose hope graffiti

Today is March 31, meaning there are 18 days left to file (198 days if you followed your CPA’s recommendation to kick the can down the road with an extension) and it is not the time to be shopping for a tax preparer. Add to that — and this bit is for any taxpayers who aren’t tax preparers reading this — this tax season in particular has been rough for clients. Nearly all of #TaxTwitter is finally setting boundaries, chopping problematic clients, hiking fees, and not taking new clients.

The utter lack of professionals accepting clients right now didn’t stop this guy from going on local TV and telling taxpayers to Google preparers and call around to see if any of them are accepting clients. In March. Almost April, actually.

OH HEY, we know of someone taking clients if you can’t find an EA or CPA.

Not only can she do taxes, she’s an anime waifu girlfriend

Although the Wall Street Journal has only recently dedicated several articles to the issue (here, here, here, and the most recent one here), the Great Shrinkening of Accountants™ has been known for years (example: this 2021 article I wrote about the accounting pipeline problem, a problem that was historically called the “talent shortage” and has been going on for years). The AICPA noticed a concerning gap in accounting graduates and CPA exam candidates as early as 2014, and we’ve known for a few years now that accounting enrollments were dropping off from a peak in 2015-16. All that to say, anyone who needs an EA or CPA to help them file for the 2022 tax year should have been Googling for one a long time ago, not 18 days before April 18th. It’s not their fault and we know local TV stations don’t read fringe accounting tabloids but still…too little too late, my guy.

Good luck to them I guess.

Related Posts

From Traditional IRA to Roth IRA: New Rollover Rules

For years prior to 2010, only taxpayers with modified AGI of $100,000 or less generally were permitted to convert a traditional IRA into a Roth IRA. For years beginning in 2010 and after, the AGI limitation has been eliminated. Thus, regardless of AGI, all otherwise eligible taxpayers will be allowed to convert an IRA to a Roth IRA. The amount converted is includible in income as if a withdrawal had been made, but no early withdrawal penalties are assessed.


Two-year income spread if conversion done in 2010 – For conversions occurring in 2010, unless a taxpayer elects otherwise, none of the amount is includible in gross income in 2010, with half of the income resulting from the conversion includible in gross income in 2011 and h, income inclusion is accelerated if converted amounts are distributed before 2012. In that case, the amount included in income in the year of the distribution is increased by the amount distributed, and the amount included in income in 2012 (or 2011 and 2012 in the case of a distribution in 2010) is the lesser of: (1) half of the amount includible in income as a result of the conversion; and (2) the remaining portion of such amount not already included in income. The following example illustrates the application of the accelerated inclusion rule.

Example – Betty has a traditional IRA with a value of $100,000 consisting of deductible contributions and earnings. Betty does not have a Roth IRA. She converts the traditional IRA to a Roth IRA in 2010, and as a result of the conversion, $100,000 is includible in gross income. Unless Betty elects otherwise, $50,000 of the income resulting from the conversion is included in income in 2011 and $50,000 in 2012.

Later in 2010, Betty takes a $20,000 distribution, which is not a qualified distribution and all of which, under the ordering rules, is attributable to amounts includible in gross income as a result of the conversion. Under the accelerated inclusion rule, $20,000 is included in income in 2010.

The amount included in income in 2011 is the lesser of (1) $50,000 (half of the income resulting from the conversion); or (2) $80,000 (the remaining income from the conversion). The amount included in income in 2012 is the lesser of (1) $50,000 (half of the income resulting from the conversion), or (2) $30,000 (the remaining income from the conversion, i.e., $100,000 – $70,000 ($20,000 included in income in 2010 and $50,000 included in income in 2011)).

Preparer note – While you cannot elect out of the two year spread on only a portion of the conversion income in 2010 (it’s an all or nothing election), husband and wife may each make separate elections for their individual IRA accounts. For example, a wife could elect to report her conversion income in 2010 and her husband could report his 2010 conversion income in 2011 and 2012. This may result a better spread of the income. The same taxpayer is allowed to make separate elections for separate IRA accounts.

If you need guidance on answering the question, “should my client convert to a Roth?” check out CPE Link’s Federal Tax Update: Part 2 webcast scheduled November-January.. You’ll get a myriad of planning ideas and even access to a simple, but sophisticated, calculator. (Note: The above information was excerpted from Vern Hoven’s manual used in the webcast.) In addition to coverage of the IRA & Individual Retirement area, you’ll get an update on Real Estate & Investment, and Estates, Trusts & Beneficiaries.