For the wealthiest among us, anyway. Sure, Alan Grayson’s ideas were helpful but sometimes you need something extra special, you know?
Related Posts
Pot Taxes May Not Be Such a Cash Cow Due to, Well, the Cash
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- February 5, 2014
I was originally going to talk about how Colorado's pot tax revenues are in trouble […]
Share this:
Think of the Tax Preparers, John Boehner!
- Adrienne Gonzalez
- October 23, 2014
The tax code is way too complex, you guys. But House Speaker John Boehner has […]
Share this:
Paul Ryan Is No Ronald Reagan
- Caleb Newquist
- April 12, 2011
Charles Krauthammer […] writes that the “most scurrilous” criticism of House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s fiscal plan is that it would cut taxes for the rich. This would, he says, be akin to making the same claim against the Ronald Reagan-Bill Bradley 1986 tax reform. Krauthammer goes on to assert that Ryan’s plan is “classic tax reform” that … broadens the base by eliminating loopholes. The facts are otherwise. The Ryan plan, at least what we know of it, would inarguably cut taxes for the rich. It in no way resembles the 1980s tax reforms of either President Reagan or Senator Bill Bradley and Representative Dick Gephardt. And it most assuredly fails to eliminate loopholes. [TaxVox, WaPo]